Skip to main content

Overview of the Advaita-Dvaita Debate Literature

Madhusudana Sarawati’s Advaita Siddhi is a polemical work - a reply to Vyasatirtha’s Nyaya-amrita who belonged to Dvaita School of Vedanta. Both works show a high level of dialectical skill and take advantage of advancement in study of logic due to Navya-Nyaya School.

Madhusudana Saraswati also wrote Advaita-ratna-rakshanam a polemical work in reply to both Dvaitins and Nyaya philosopher specially Shankara Mishra’s Bhedaratna.

The Advaita - Dvaita debate does not end with Advaita Siddhi. Ramacharya wrote Nyaya-amrita-tarangini criticizing Advaita Siddhi. Nyaya-amrita-kantakoddhara of Anandbhattaraka was another counter-attack on Advaita Siddhi.

Madhusudnana’s disciple Balabhadra wrote a commentary on Advaita Siddhi called simply Vyakhya. Like Vijayandra-tirtha’s commentary Amoda on Nyaya-amrita it is not a reply to any other polemical work.

Brahmananda’s Guruchandrika was a reply to Tarangini and Kantakoddhara. Gauda Brahmananda was a very famous logician and in Advaita tradition it is famous that Advaita tradition begins with Gauda (Gaudapada) and ends with Gauda (Gauda Brahmananda). The abridged version of Guruchandrika is called Laghuchandrika. In the 19th Century Panchpagesha Shastri commented on this work - it is called Bhavapraksha which has another commentary on it called Tippana by V.Subramaniya Shastri. Brahmananda’s Nyayaratnavali is a commentary on Madhusudana’s Siddhanta Bindu.

From Dvaita’s side Vanamali Mishra wrote two polemical works in reply to Brahmananda - Nyaya-amrita-tarangini-saurabha and nyaya-amrita-saugandhya. From Advaita’s side Vitthalesha’s commentary on Guruchandrika is considered the final work after which the debate ended - in whose favor is debatable. But according to a modern dvaitin - R Nagaraja Sharma - in his book - Reign Of Realism In Indian Philosophy Vitthalesha’s work consists of no reply to Vanamali Mishra. However in 20th century a famous advaitin N.S. Anantakrishna Shastri did write a work to criticize Vanamali Mishra in his Saugandhya Vimarsha.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Criticism of Karma Theory

  Karma is a theory that believes that there is a moral providence in the world. The nature of this providence is to reward good and punish evil actions. But there are four big problems with it: Injustice is a patent fact in the world. On the other hand Karma theory would have us believe that contrary to our everyday life experiences there is complete justice in the world. People get what they deserve. Hence blame the one who suffers. Anyone who is enjoying his riches even though ill won is a good man. How many times do we see that something bad happens to someone who is good and something good happens to morally reprehensible people? The theory of karma is not a theory that arises from the need to explain our everyday life experiences. It is a dogma and forces us to interpret our experience in the light of this dogma. Since it cannot explain why there is injustice and misfortune in the world it posits the concept of rebirth. One proposition is sought to be validated through anothe...
1 comment
Read more

Jiddu Krishnamurti - The Movement Of Thought

  There is conflict inner and outer when the world presents a challenge to an individual and demands a response. The mind in order to deal with an ever changing world imposes a certain pattern on it based on past experiences and which has a means – end structure. This gives direction to all human actions which are teleological i.e. they are always goal directed. How exactly does such a process arise? Three distinct processes can be discerned but these should not be seen in a chronological but in a functional sense: a)       Means – End Structure First there is sensation, pleasant, unpleasant or neutral. Memory records it and mind projects a future state where that same sensation can be either repeated or avoided. Thought arises parasitic on memory and allows the perpetuation or the continuity of the past. This is the beginning of psychological time – a past state seeking continuity in the future and conditioning response in the present. Thus JK says tha...
1 comment
Read more

SCHOOLS OF INDIAN THOUGHT - PART 2 - NYAYA EPISTEMOLOGY

  I. JNANA Jnana is usually translated as cognition. Cognition is the only thing that has intentionality or the property of being directed at the world. It reveals objects in the world towards which goal directed action can be initiated. It is of the nature of illumination like a lamp and generates awareness in the subject of is objects. It is always used in an episodic sense and never in a dispositional sense. The later job is done by samskaras. Jnana is used to connote mental states like perception, memory, introspection, assumption, doubt, belief etc. Jnana is divided into anubhava and smriti. Anubhava is of the nature of presentation of its object while smriti is recollection of a previous experience. Anubhava of an object makes an impression in the mind of the subject and is stored there. When it is revived due to diverse factors it leads to memory of its object. So anubhava is presentational, of the form ‘I experience an object’, while memory is derivative on anubhava for i...
Post a Comment
Read more